Whose God?
Saturday, September 5, 2009 at 11:04AM |
Roberta Maria Atti In researching the question I raised in my previous post, regarding the presence of "God among us" and the possible consequences that might befall upon those thereby graced, I've come across a series of articles, published in THEOSOPHY, (Vol. 53, No. four through 10 - February, 1965) about the Albigensians, and, having been unable to put this material down ever since, have incurred in several sleepless nights as a result.
Among the many heretical groups persecuted by the Holy Inquisition's tribunals, and decimated by its mad crusaders, the Albigensians, or Cathars, also known as "the pure ones" who inhabited Southern France, still remain, almost 8 centuries after being massacred by their fellow Christians, among the most awe-inspiring cultures ever to grace European history.
Not that the less famous, just as innocent, countless numbers of people, whose main fault might have been being born in the wrong place at the wrong time, do not matter. On the contrary. I am certain that the human heart will continue to grieve their loss for a very long time, whether the human mind will ever recognize the depth and/or the source of such suffering or not.
Not one of those who have died needlessly, mercilessly and innocently, in any of the ongoing religious wars that continuosly infest our planet, can be referred to as an inconsequential loss, whether they died at the hands of a psychopath like Torquemada, or as a result of being blown up by a manic, practically illiterate 18 year old kid, brain damaged by too many low fat dinners and addicted to the superhuman thrills of War Craft games.
All of these are holy deaths, I am convinced, and will have to be honored as such, every last one of them, not to mention the immesurable life debt they represent, which will have to be paid back by humanity, to humanity, if humans are going to make it as a species.
The Cathars, however, having reached a peak of social and moral standards rarely achieved in the history of human kind, represent a particularly painful chapter of human history to think about, write about or grieve over, even with the fullest compliance of one's most forgiving heart, since the sorrow their story evokes is simply too great to bear.
Truth be told, it is unthinkable, impossible to envision, how a human being could ever turn into an instrument of such evil as that which unleashed itself onto these glorious examples of human dignity, morality and intellectual brilliance, and that's perhaps why I cannot help but to venture into the possibly unanswerable question regarding the relationship between good and evil.
In essence, I am attempting to describe the dichotomy of these two, perennially opposite, complementary principles, from a phenomenological perspective, with a therapeutic intentionality as my intellectual vehicle and with as much humility as I am capable of as my only protection, not because I need to point fingers at anyone in particular, but rather because I realize I won't be able to rest until I've said what I have to say.
What happens after that, does not concern me.
Maybe the question arose clearly only a couple of days ago.
I was sitting at a local Diner's breakfast counter at the time, by myself, listening to an exquisite Beethoven Sonata in my iPod, casually watching a TV screen with close-caption, reporting live from the Catholic Church where the late Senator Ted Kennedy's funeral was being officiated.
Ah, the power of the written word! Had this been a normal TV, with regular audio, I would have easily tuned it out, having had many years of practice in mastering the skill.
But close-caption? It caught me unprepared and my eyes were allured into reading.
As I savored my eggs-over-easy, naively unaware of what was about to occur, I looked on and kept reading the words as they appeared onto the screen, seemingly out of nowhere, slightly entertained by the not-so-occasional spelling mistake that threatened to change the tone of the report from a somber historical account to a Sesame Street spelling parody.
Certain that I was the only one thinking such irreverent thoughts, and careful not to betray my amusement and allow my face to be seen smiling, I proceeded to focus again on my eggs, guiltlessly looking down at my plate, in an attempt to convey an attitude of discreet composure to any possible onlooker.
Too late, I regretted. My attention had already been snatched by the incongruity of the show I had been tricked into watching. "How can this be?" I thought to myself. "How can all these people be sitting there, pretending that this is for real, and no one's cracking up?"
"Distinguished guests, we are gathered here today to honor the memory of a great man..." I read the words, appearing as the priest spoke them and, as he continued to offer tribute to the recently deceased hero, for one of his great deeds or another, I saw a few middle aged men, dressed in the usual Catholic clergy's garb, carrying out a ceremony so filled with contradictions that I truly wondered how any of them, humorless as they seemed, could keep a straight face.
Granted that it was a funeral, where the expression of sympathetic sorrow must be maintained at all times by everyone present, whereas laughter might have been frowned upon, if pretense, hypocrisy and falshood were the parameters of an artistic form, I'd say that this particular ceremony would have to have taken the crown as its masterpiece.
I wondered how many hours it must have taken the unfortunate PR person to figure out who should be sitting where in the Church, and next to whom, so as to avoid insulting this important one or the other. The poor chap must have sweated seven shirts, as they say in Italy, realizing that, inevitably, one or more of the illustrious guests might find his or her seating unacceptable and demand that the head of the responsible party be brought to them on a silver platter.
The officiating priest looked himself quite agitated, as he rattled out, over and over again, all the Presidents' and Vice Presidents' and ex-Presidents and ex-Vice Presidents' names, along with the respective First, Second, Third and Fourth Ladies' names, all of whom were sitting in the first row, sure to be captured a'plenty by the ever hungry cameras, and then the names of the slightly less powerful ones, sitting right behind them, and always in the proper order, making sure never to alter the ranks or else...(we all know where his head would have ended up, should he forget the PR chap's detailed instructions and warnings!).
It would have been funny, if it hadn't brought up my indignation about the Albigensian Crusade, still so fresh on my mind from my recent research.
OK. I know. This may sounds like cheap polemic, but come on: here is the same clergy whose power, organized through political administration and strengthened by legal jurisdiction, has been oppressing and terrorizing millions of good, innocent people for centuries on end.
Here are the same men who, only a few centuries ago, would have gladly wrapped me up in rags, maybe you too, and eagerly lit us up on fire atop a heap of dead wood, for our soul's sake and in the name of God.
Here is the same old bunch of celibate male priests, representing the same old celibate male divinity, still symbolic of the most supreme power on earth, officiating the funereal rites for a man whose wealth and power, as everyone knows, was acquired through a family legacy of the most despicable kind. Not to mention that such a wealthy man's political connections require the presence, at his funeral, of the most influential people currently alive on earth, including the same sort of self-righteous ignoramus (to use a respectful description) whose hands are soiled with the blood of the most recent religious war's victims, for what is the war in Iraq, really, if not yet another, blasted, bloody Crusade?!
What a farse! I thought to myself. Or is it me? Am I the only one who finds the whole thing absurd, distasteful, immoral, despicable and down right revolting?
Mind you, not because I care about who feels like honoring whom. Oh, no! I couldn't care less about that. Bow down to your own gods and let others do the same. That's religious freedom's first tenet.
Rather, I feel a sense of indignation welling up in me, at the thought of what was done to the Cathars by the very same people who are still claiming to be the holy ones while, in reality, all they do is cater to earthly powers, no matter how much evil, ruthless killing and corruption these powers continue to perpetrate.
Look, I don't mind moving on either. Let us forgive one another and, together, create a better future. I'm all in favor of that. But that's not what this is. This is the same old story, just a little less gruesome, because, after all, we are civilized people, aren't we?
Just think of how many homeless people could have been given a permanent home and a secure job, with the money, power and resources that went into burying this one rich, dead man.
Wouldn't that sort of memorial rite have been more pleasing to God?
I guess that depends on whose God we are talking about, doesn't it?
Cathars,
Reflections,
Troubadours,
great artists,
hope,
humanism,
humanity,
life,
love,
religion,
social issues,
suffering,
war and peace
3 References tagged
Albigensian Crusades,
Cathars,
Church,
Inquisition,
conflict,
consciousness,
good and evil 
